Note:
This article was printed in the Telegram
Tribune on July 5, 2003. It has been reprinted with the permission of
Stephen T. Hearst. It is intended to give an update, additional information
and discuss the process on which the "Hearst Ranch Conservation Project"
must go through before it is completed. Other than providing this news
related article for this Web Site Stephen T. Hearst has no connection
to the information published on this Web Site.
By Stephen
T. Hearst
July 5, 2003
Much has happened
in the last several months to bring the conservation of the Hearst Ranch
a step closer to reality. For several years, I have spearheaded The
Hearst Corporation’s efforts to find a conservation solution for
the 82,000 acre ranch that will ensure the protection of resources,
benefit the public, and be consistent with our fiduciary obligations.
A major milestone of that solution came together with our Conservation
Framework that was announced with the American
Land Conservancy. In February we announced a one year conservation
option period with the American Land
Conservancy, and are now busy with all of the normal steps necessary
to finalize a successful conservation transaction. The State’s
recent announcement of their direct involvement in negotiations is also
positive. Let me summarize key steps, which have been informed by the
many comments that we have received to date from the community:
Agency Involvement:
We are pleased that the State of California is actively engaged in evaluating
this conservation opportunity and the potential for Proposition 50 bond
proceeds to make conservation of Hearst Ranch into a reality. The California
Coastal Conservancy is taking the lead for state agencies, and recently
announced they are commencing their own independent appraisal and evaluating
the resource values of the ranch. As we have been doing actively for
the past two years, the public agencies have been meeting with interested
parties to help them understand the balance between what works for the
property owner and what best serves the public interest. Before funding
for any conservation transaction is finalized, agencies will hold public
hearings and provide opportunity for public review and comment.
Conservation
Easement: A detailed conservation easement is being prepared,
consistent with the Conservation Framework, which will govern the use
of the ranch in perpetuity. The easement, which must also be approved
by funding agencies, will include legally enforceable provisions to
ensure permanent protection of the entire ranch and its conservation
values. Like many other successful conservation easements, a detailed
agricultural management plan will be prepared with requirements for
regular monitoring and enforcement, if needed. The easement will contain
detailed criteria for locating the 27 owner home sites that would recognize
sensitive environmental and cultural resource areas, respect existing
public views from Highway 1 and Hearst Castle, and be located near existing
roads within the interior of the ranch. It will also contain limitations
on location and acreage of cropland uses.
West Side
Protections: This transaction originated as a conservation
easement and Hearst was not a willing seller of any property in fee.
After considerable discussion and negotiations with conservation organizations
and potential funding sources, Hearst has agreed to convey most of the
land west of Highway 1, with the rest of the west side lands protected
in perpetuity by a conservation easement. The west side easement will
provide for public access, prohibit all residential development and
limit visitor serving uses to Old San Simeon Village, including a small,
historically-compatible inn inspired by recently rediscovered Julia
Morgan drawings. We believe this represents the longest stretch of California
coastline ever protected in a single conservation transaction, allowing
for an 18 mile coastal trail.
Baseline
Inventory: Independent experts will document the current conditions
of the ranch. This information will be incorporated into a report to
be used by the easement holder to monitor compliance with the easement
terms, including protection of the conservation values. The areas of
expertise include botany, wildlife, fisheries, water resources, cultural,
and grazing management. These independent experts will also verify that
the retained owner homesites meet siting criteria, though additional
review will be required when any permits are requested. The baseline
inventory will also include state-of-the-art aerial photography that
can be updated periodically to assist in monitoring easement compliance.
Appraisals:
ALC has retained an independent
third-party appraisal team, and the State is in the process of commissioning
its own appraisal. The first appraisal phase determines the “before”
value. This is the value of the ranch today, including the 271 existing
legal lots and the existing resort zoning, unencumbered by the conservation
easement and before the sale portions of the ranch on the west side
of the highway are conveyed. The second phase of the appraisal will
determine the “after” value which is the restricted value
of the remaining portions after the easement is in effect—including
the elimination of all owner homesite rights other than the 27 retained
owner homesites. The value of the conservation transaction is the difference
between the “before” value and the “after” value.
Funding for the conservation transaction will require approval of appraisals.
As part of a successful conservation transaction, Hearst has committed
to make significant donations of property value, including in conjunction
with the California Natural Heritage Preservation Tax Credit program.
All projections to date, which will be confirmed by independent appraisals,
show that Hearst’s proposed donations will bring the publicly
funded price significantly below the fair market value.
Timing:
The option period expires in February 2004 and we are making every effort
to meet that deadline.
Many local residents
and organizations who opposed previous plans for the ranch are now strongly
committed to the Conservation Framework, which we have put forward with
the American Land Conservancy.
We appreciate their willingness to give our proposal a fair review and
their public endorsements of the Framework. We also appreciate their
patience with the process and their understanding that something as
complex as preservation of 128 square miles takes time. I remain confident
that we will succeed.